Funding Superfund

What is the Polluter Pays Principle?

The Polluter Pays Principle is the concept that those responsible for creating pollution should also be financially responsible for damages done to the environment as a result of the pollution. This principle is utilized around the world as a way to prevent damage to human and environmental health; some examples of the Polluter Pays Principle in the US to include the Gas Guzzler Tax and the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards for motor vehicles.

Until 1995, the Superfund program also included Polluter Pays taxes, which were pooled into a trust fund that helped pay for the cleanup of Superfund sites. Despite bipartisan support, as evidenced by Reagan, Bush, and Clinton all seeking an extension of the taxes, Congress allowed the Superfund Polluter Pays taxes to lapse in 1995. The trust fund, which at one point was making almost $2 million per year between 1993 and 1995, was completed depleted of funds raised by the Polluter Pays tax by 2003.

Crude Oil and Chemical Taxes

Without Polluter Pays taxes, the Superfund program has become largely reliant on taxpayer money; according to a 2015 Government Accountability Office (GAO) report, taxpayers cover 80% of Superfund costs. To shift the financial responsibility of Superfund site cleanup away from taxpayers and back to those responsible for the pollution, Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) introduced the Superfund Polluter Pays Restoration Act of 2017. By raising more funds for the Superfund program, this legislation would hopefully allow the program to work more effectively and efficiently.

If enacted, this bill would make the following changes:

  1. Reinstate the Hazardous Substance Superfund financing rate
  2. Increase the tax rate* from 9.7 cents to 15.8 cents per barrel of crude oil Reinstate and increase the rate of taxes* on taxable chemicals**
  3. Modify the definition of “crude oil” to include any bitumen or bituminous mixture, any oil derived from such mixture, and any oil derived from kerogen-bearing sources

*Adjust for inflation after 2018

Put the Super back into Superfund

Want to see polluters pay for their messes rather than taxpayers? Contact your representatives and tell them to support Senator Booker’s bill: Superfund Polluter Pays Restoration Act of 2017 (S.2198).

Contact Your Represenative
  • Libby April 2019

EPA removes a portion of Libby from the federal Superfund site

April 18th, 2019|Comments Off on EPA removes a portion of Libby from the federal Superfund site

A portion of Libby’s asbestos cleanup has been completed, with the EPA removing that area from the list of federal Superfund sites. Read more here.

  • image003

Virginia, EPA to recoup nearly $64 million for Portsmouth Superfund site

March 10th, 2019|Comments Off on Virginia, EPA to recoup nearly $64 million for Portsmouth Superfund site

After years of wrangling over who should pay to clean up a Superfund site on the Southern Branch of the Elizabeth River, a proposed settlement would reimburse Virginia and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency nearly [...]

  • IMG_2157 (003)

Community Leaders Travel to D.C. to Demand EPA Action at their Superfund Sites

March 6th, 2019|Comments Off on Community Leaders Travel to D.C. to Demand EPA Action at their Superfund Sites

Leaders from fence line communities met with EPA representatives Tuesday, March 5th at EPA Headquarters in Washington, D.C. to push for action at their Superfund sites. “We need action in our communities where people are [...]

  • 1034px-Environmental_Protection_Agency_logo.svg

EPA Should Improve the Reliability of Data on National Priorities List Sites Affecting Indian Tribes

March 3rd, 2019|Comments Off on EPA Should Improve the Reliability of Data on National Priorities List Sites Affecting Indian Tribes

EPA's National Priorities List sites are some of the most contaminated places in the country. They may pose unique challenges for Indian tribes. For example, toxic substances in 2 New York rivers pose a threat [...]

Put the Super back into Superfund