News

shutterstock_159179780

Fracking Linked to More Ohio Earthquakes

Print

Another rare case of fracking-caused earthquakes has jolted Ohio.

A new study connects some 400 micro-earthquakes in Harrison County, near the town of Canton, to hydraulic fracturing wells. The three wells operated from September through October 2013 in the Utica Shale. Ten of the quakes registered between magnitude 1.7 and magnitude 2.2, but the tremors were too deep to cause damage or to be easily felt by people, according to the study, published today (Oct. 14) in the journal Seismological Research Letters.

The new study is the second report this year of fracking-linked earthquakes from drilling in the Utica Shale. The shale is a rock formation that is deeper and closer than the Marcellus Shale to the crystalline basement rocks where faults are more common. In March, scientists with Ohio’s Department of Natural Resources (ODNR) shut down drilling at seven Utica Shale gas wells in Poland Township after fracking triggered two small earthquakes. The ODNR now requires monitoring of seismic activity at fracking sites near known fault lines, and reducing the flow of water if earthquakes begin to occur.


The Harrison case is one of the few scientifically documented incidents of hydraulic fracturing causing earthquakes on a fault, said lead study author Paul Friberg, a seismologist and owner of Instrumental Software Technologies Inc. (ISTI). Harrison County is the fifth documented case in the world, Friberg said. Other locations of earthquakes caused by fracking include Oklahoma; the United Kingdom; British Columbia, Canada; and Ohio’s Poland Township. [7 Ways the Earth Changes in the Blink of an Eye]

Fracking involves pumping large volumes of water, sand and chemicals into underground shale or other rocks, such as coal. The pressure forces open the rocks, allowing trapped oil and gas to escape.

Within the oil and gas industry, hydraulic fracturing is known to cause earthquakes, but the tremors are usually so small that seismometers barely wiggle in response. The micro-earthquakes from fracturing rocks often register as negative magnitude 1 to negative magnitude 3. (Themagnitude scale is logarithmic. On a seismogram, a wiggle of 20 millimeters, or 0.8 inches, corresponds to a magnitude 2 earthquake, and a wiggle of 0.02 millimeters is magnitude minus 1.)

“Fracking earthquakes pose no real hazard, because they are so small in the majority of cases,” Friberg told Live Science in an email interview.

The Harrison County quakes struck less than 1 mile (1.4 kilometers) below the horizontal wells. Shaking started just 26 hours after fracking began on Sept. 29, 2013. Nearly 190 earthquakes hit during a 39-hour period on Oct. 1 and 2.

The quakes tapered off after the fracking was completed on the wells, the study reports.

Because the earthquakes line up in an east-west direction in ancient crystalline rocks beneath the Utica Shale, Friberg and his co-authors think the fracking activated a small, unknown fault. The fracking water could have “greased” the fault, unclamping the fracture and allowing it to slip.

Since 2008, shale gas drilling has been linked to earthquakes from Oklahoma to Ohio, but in almost all cases, the quakes are tied to wastewater disposal wells. Fracking produces millions of gallons of wastewater, which is pumped back underground and stored in deep wells to protect groundwater.

Though Ohio is one of the few states to monitor wells for earthquake activity, many of the small faults triggered by injection wells or fracking have never been previously identified by scientists.

“Ohio has been very proactive in installing seismometers throughout eastern Ohio to better analyze seismic data as it relates to oil and gas activity. If the data conclusively shows a probable correlation to a felt event, ODNR has and will continue to take the appropriate steps necessary to ensure public health and safety is protected,” said Bethany McCorkle, ODNR spokeswoman.

Editor’s note: This story was updated to clarify that Paul Friberg said that this was a rare case of hydraulic fracturing causing earthquakes on a fault, not of felt earthquakes.

Email Becky Oskin or follow her @beckyoskin. Follow us @livescience,Facebook & Google+. Original article on Live Science.

NBC NEWS - Pictured: Russian nuclear powered icebreaker Yamal traveling through the Arctic Ocean on its way to the North Pole. The icebreaker is a ship for use in waters continuously covered with ice. Photo taken on July 3, 2007 -- Photo by: Nery Ynclan/NBC NewsWire

Climate Change Poses Challenges to National Security

Print

By Lolita C. Baldor

From HuffPost Green

NBC NEWS - Pictured: Russian nuclear powered icebreaker Yamal traveling through the Arctic Ocean on its way to the North Pole. The icebreaker is a ship for use in waters continuously covered with ice. Photo taken on July 3, 2007 -- Photo by: Nery Ynclan/NBC NewsWire

AREQUIPA, Peru (Associated Press) — Rising sea levels and other effects of climate change will pose major challenges for America’s military, including more and worse natural disasters and the threat that food and water shortages could fuel disputes and instability around the world, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said Monday.

Addressing a conference of military leaders as the Pentagon released a new report on the issue, Hagel said, “Our militaries’ readiness could be tested, and our capabilities could be stressed.”

U.S. military officials have long warned that changes in climate patterns, resulting in increased severe weather events and coastal flooding, will have a broad and costly impact on the Defense Department’s ability to protect the nation and respond to natural and humanitarian disasters in the United States and around the globe.

The new report — described as a Pentagon roadmap — identifies four things that it says will affect the U.S. military: rising global temperatures, changing precipitation patterns, more extreme weather and rising sea levels. It calls on the department and the military services to identify more specific concerns, including possible effects on the more than 7,000 bases and facilities, and to start putting plans in place to deal with them.

“Climate change is a ‘threat multiplier’ because it has the potential to exacerbate many of the challenges we already confront today — from infectious disease to armed insurgencies — and to produce new challenges in the future,” Hagel said. He spoke during the opening session of the conference, which was attended by defense ministers and military chiefs of more than 30 countries from the Americas, Spain and Portugal.

Changing climate trends could spur more natural disasters, demanding more military support, he said. “Our coastal installations could be vulnerable to rising shorelines and flooding, and extreme weather could impair our training ranges, supply chains and critical equipment.”

More broadly, the report warns that as temperatures rise and severe weather increases, food, water and electricity shortages could create instability in many countries, spreading disease, causing mass migration and opening the door for extremists to take advantage of fractures in already-unstable countries.

The report comes amid an ongoing debate within the administration and Congress over the actual extent and existence of global warming and climate change. But Hagel, who is on a six-day, three-country trip to South America, seemed to have little question about the impending changes.

“The loss of glaciers will strain water supplies in several areas of our hemisphere. Destruction and devastation from hurricanes can sow the seeds for instability. Droughts and crop failures can leave millions of people without any lifeline, and trigger waves of mass migration,” he told the ministers at this mountain resort in the Andes near the southern tip of Peru.

“We have already seen these events unfold in other regions of the world, and there are worrying signs that climate change will create serious risks to stability in our own hemisphere,” he said.

For the U.S., rising sea levels could eventually put vast stretches of Navy docks and other military installations under water, in places like Norfolk, Virginia, Honolulu and other coastal locations worldwide.

The Pentagon has been working for years to reduce the military’s heavy footprint on the earth by using alternative fuels and conducting maintenance aimed at managing water use and encroachment on natural resources.

But, according to a federal greenhouse gas inventory, the department was responsible for 71 percent of the federal government’s carbon footprint in 2010, producing 95.4 million tons of carbon dioxide. That put the military’s footprint at about the same size as that of the entire country of Chile.

The greenhouse gas report said that more than 60 percent of the Pentagon’s carbon footprint cannot be reduced easily.

In its new report, the Pentagon said it has to better define how climate change could affect military operations, training, testing and readiness.

The issue is a deep concern to many South and Central American nations that have long stretches of coastline. Gen. John Kelly, the top U.S. military commander in South America, was with Hagel at the conference.

Caribbean island countries in particular worry about rising sea levels and more violent hurricanes, he said, adding that “the fact that they’re all here talking about how important this is will make a difference.”

One key national security issue is the Arctic, where melting ice caps are opening up sea lanes, spurring competition for the lucrative oil and gas deposits and increasing the use of the icy waters for military exercises and transit.

“We see an Arctic that is melting, meaning that most likely a new sea lane will emerge,” Hagel said during his stop in Chile. “We know that there are significant minerals and natural deposits of oil and natural gas there. That means that nations will compete for those natural resources.”

Last November, at a security conference in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Hagel said the U.S. would assert its sovereignty in the Arctic, even as Russia, China and other countries stake their own claims in the largely untapped region. Increased use of the Arctic will require the U.S. to fill gaps in satellite and communications coverage, add deep-water ports and buy more ships that can withstand frigid waters.

In addition to those costs, the U.S. will have to address other changes in its military installations. Officials don’t yet have cost estimates.


AP Science Writer Seth Borenstein contributed to this report.

lovecanal

Support “The Canal” Documentary about the Love Canal Disaster

Print

A team of documentary filmmakers have worked for three years to complete a project on Love Canal, telling the story of the disaster and documenting the testimonies of those still affected by toxic chemicals in the Love Canal area. They are now raising the money they need to finish editing the film and get it out to the world.

According to the filmmakers, the documentary has two goals:

“The first is to save the families living in Love Canal today. And save is not too big a word: the rates of leukemia, miscarriages, and heart conditions are through the roof. Babies conceived in the area are at a hugely elevated risk of having birth defects…

The second goal is what effects us all. There are practically no safeguards between you and toxic chemicals either in the products you use or in the waste streams where they are deposited. The current laws do not require a company to prove that a chemical is safe before it is used. We must amend this law so that we can live without this unnecessary risk. We believe there is a way for companies to make money while behaving responsibly. This film introduces people to this debate through one of the most infamous chemical disasters. It tells a specific human story that affects us all and hopefully will inspire us to demand change.”

To follow updates about the film, visit their Facebook Page.

To contribute to the film, visit their Fundraising Page.

20140815072704-Lois_Gibbs_and_her_children_Missy_and_Michael_carrying_signs_at_Love_Canal_protest_at_the_Niagara_Falls_NY_City_Hall

The Canal – a documentary

Print

Children are sick and dying. We can do something about it.
This campaign is raising funds on behalf of Clean Air Coalition Of Western New York Inc, a verified nonprofit. The campaign does not necessarily reflect the views of the nonprofit or have any formal association with it. All contributions are considered unrestricted gifts and can’t be specified for any particular purpose.

A DIFFERENCE

A group of smart, committed women have been telling us something for almost 40 years: we need to protect our children from the shocking links between chemicals and human disease.  But it seems like no one has been listening.

Love Canal is a community in Niagara Falls which discovered in the mid-1970′s that its elementary school had been built on top of 22,000 tons of toxic chemicals.  Realizing that this explained why their children were sick and dying, a group of women fought the government and industry with extraordinary determination and bravery for two years to have their families evacuated.

The area, however, was declared habitable in the early 1990s and the homes were resold for below market value to working families who jumped at the chance to own a little piece of the dream. But the dream has become a nightmare.  The same symptoms that ravaged the community in the ’70s are back with a vengeance.


We’ve been filming with families who bought those homes and we need your help to finish the movie and tell the world this story which highlights an issue that affects us all.  1 in 2 Americans lives within 10 miles of a site like Love Canal and we are exposed to toxic chemicals in waste streams and in products every day.

TWO GOALS

We have two goals in making this film.


  • The first is to save the families living in Love Canal today.  And save is not too big a word: the rates of leukemia, miscarriages, and heart conditions are through the roof. Babies conceived in the area are at a hugely elevated risk of having birth defects.  Logan in the video above is just one example.
  • The second goal is what effects us all.  There are practically no safeguards between you and toxic chemicals either in the products you use or in the waste streams where they are deposited.  The current laws do not require a company to prove that a chemical is safe before it is used.  We must amend this law so that we can live without this unnecessary risk.  We believe there is a way for companies to make money while behaving responsibly.  This film introduces people to this debate through one of the most infamous chemical disasters.  It tells a specific human story that affects us all and hopefully will inspire us to demand change.


WHERE THINGS STAND

We have shot the film over the course of the last three years and are ready to finish it and get it out in the world.  We need to raise our goal so that we can finish editing the film, do the picture and audio post production work and license the archival material we need to use to tell the historical story.  Only by showing how big this story was in the 1970s can we underline the craziness that it’s repeating itself.  There’s something beautiful about seeing the women who fought the original battle interviewed now – they understood the lessons, they knew what should be done because their children suffered the consequences.  But as so often happens, those that know a truth which challenges the status quo are marginalized or ignored.


Any amount will help us.  If you can’t contribute, and we get it, tell your friends and family about us.  Whether they can contribute or not, it’s good for people to be aware of what is happening to us all.  The people in places like Love Canal are at particular risk but we are all being exposed to toxic chemicals on a daily basis.  It’s time to take them out of products and waste streams and to properly manage the hazards we have already created.

Democracy has gone a little off the rails and it’s time we put it back on track.  We hope this film can play a part in doing that.


YOUR DONATION IS TAX DEDUCTIBLE

All of your donation minus the market value of any physical perks (i.e. the t-shirt and the book) are tax deductible.  You will receive an email with all the information you need to take the deduction on your 2014 tax return.

THE CLEAN AIR COALITION OF WESTERN NEW YORK

A percentage of the money you give will go to The Clean Air Coalition of Western New York, which is an amazing organization dedicated to training grassroots activists and communities to run and win environmental justice and public health campaigns.  Given the amazing legacy of Lois Gibbs and her own organization, The Center For Environmental Health and Justice, this feels like a fitting way to not only complete the film but to encourage ordinary citizens to take their health into their own hands.

1010_WEB_a_Moccasin_Bend_t240

Report: Lead from police firing range on Moccasin Bend may be leaching into the Tennessee River

Print

An environmental assessment of the joint Chattanooga-Hamilton County firing range on Moccasin Bend indicates that the nearly 40 years of spent bullets at the site may be causing lead-laden surface water to flow into the Tennessee River.

And local and federal officials say they may need to review a recent decision to keep the guns firing on the Bend.

The assessment, paid for by the National Park Service to estimate the cost of cleaning up the site, shows that about 6,147 tons of surface soil across five areas on the range contain more than 400 mg/kg — the federal Environmental Protection Agency’s acceptable lead limit for the site.

No subsurface soil or water is jeopardized by lead, but the report shows lead-contaminated surface water is likely finding its way to the river, either through stormwater drainage ditches or natural routes.

Lead contamination can impair learning and behavioral development in children, and cause nerve and organ damage in adults, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Chattanooga’s drinking water is collected upstream from the Bend, but the Tennessee River serves as a drinking water source for towns to the west of the Scenic City, out to Paducah, Ky.

In a separate note, the assessment found that a fire pit police had used to burn “cardboard targets, ammunition boxes and household trash” contained lead and arsenic, and was potentially leeching naphthalene, selenium and mercury — all semi-volatile organic compounds — into the groundwater under the Bend.

The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry shows high concentrations of naphthalene destroys red blood cells in humans and causes cancer in animals; toxic levels of selenium cause neurological damage; and too much mercury can damage the brain, kidneys and developing fetuses.

The firing range has caused friction between Friends of Moccasin Bend, an advocacy group for the nearby Moccasin Bend National Archaeological District, and the city and county governments.

Former local officials agreed to move the gun range off the Bend and donate the land to the National Park Service more than a decade ago to expand the archaeological district and the Chickamauga and Chattanooga National Military Park.

But in August, current administrations said the $1.2 million price tag to remove the 40 years of lead in the ground at the range — coupled with the cost of relocating the training facility after a planned indoor range was nixed last year — was too great.

But Thursday, Hamilton County Mayor Jim Coppinger said the findings in the environmental assessment give “obvious reason to be concerned.”

“It’s something we take seriously, and I’m comfortable in saying the city takes it seriously,” Coppinger said. “Given the report, I think it’s important that we go back and review our options with regard to the firing range.”

But Coppinger stressed that police still need a viable place to train.

“At the end of the day, what we have to be able to do is to offer our law enforcement personnel, including in the municipalities, the best training we can possibly offer them,” Coppinger said.

Chattanooga Mayor Andy Berke was traveling and unavailable for comment Thursday, but spokeswoman Lacie Stone said the administration is “thoroughly reviewing the report” and may do its own water quality analysis on the site.

Stone said the city was dedicated to providing green space and parks for residents, adding that it gave the park service 13 acres on the Bend last year.

“And even though building a new, indoor police training facility is cost prohibitive, we will continue to work with Friends of Moccasin Bend toward a solution that is in the best interest of Chattanooga and our public safety employees,” Stone said.

Whether a firing range is there or not, the city and county are responsible for its environmental impacts, according to state law.

Troy Keith, environmental field office manager with the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, said his agency did not regulate the firing range site, because no one has asked for help or complained.

But if toxins are leaking onto the river or groundwater, TDEC would get involved.

“We certainly would not like contamination coming from the site, so if we find that, it would be actionable,” Keith said.

Moccasin Bend’s archaeological district designation was initially driven by federal officials, and U.S. Rep. Chuck Fleischmann said Thursday he was picking up the torch.

He said he set up a meeting for later this month with the Moccasin Bend group, along with representatives from Sens. Bob Corker’s and Lamar Alexander’s offices to find a solution.

“I just want to work toward an amicable solution consistent with what’s been laid out,” Fleischmann said. “It’s going to be a beautiful addition to the national park.”

Contact staff writer Louie Brogdon at lbrogdon@timesfreepress.com, @glbrogdoniv on Twitter or at 423-757-6481.

pregnant-363668_1280

In Massachusetts, contaminated drinking water linked to stillbirths

Print

By Gail Sullivan
From The Washington Post

For nearly 20 years, New Englanders drank and bathed in water without knowing it was laced with a neurotoxin. The chemical leached into the water from vinyl coating sprayed inside water pipes in the late 1960s in response to complaints the water smelled and tasted funny.

More than half of New England’s 1,050 miles of water pipes sprayed with the contaminant are in Massachusetts, mostly in the Cape Cod region. The poison, tetrachloroethylene or PCE, still widely used in dry cleaning, wasn’t discovered in the water supply until 1979.

A new study published in the journal Environmental Health shows that the exposure to the poison is linked to increased risk for stillbirths and other pregnancy complications.

To read more, visit <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/10/06/in-
massachusetts-contaminated-drinking-water-linked-to-stillbirths/”>The Washington Post

The study itself can be accessed at the Environmental Health Journal.

As the Global Frackdown draws near, actions are taking place on every continent, including Antarctica!

3 Days Until the Global Frackdown!

Print



Image from Food and Water Watch


As the Global Frackdown draws near, actions are taking place on every continent – even Antarctica, as shown in the picture above!

One of the powerful things about the Global Frackdown is how it links together campaigns happening across the world and the images that we are able to share with each other and the world is a big part of that. Food & Water Watch will be working to put together an album of high quality images from actions across the world to share. To include photos from you actions, please email photos to photos@fwwatch.org (we won’t be able to include them all, but we’ll do the best we can!) Also – remember to join the Global Frackdown main facebook event page and invite your networks. It is also a good place to post photos: https://www.facebook.com/events/1578033332337030/

Get down with the #GlobalFrackdown this Saturday and join the movement to #BanFracking in your community! http://fwwat.ch/1rFSmIC

B821730398Z.1_20141008062353_000_GMU1BB9FT.2_Gallery

U.S. Steel: New spills add to legacy of steelmaking pollution

Print

U.S. Steel’s plan to off-load its Hamilton property is complicated by a legacy of historic pollution — but spills continue right up to the present day.

Ministry of Environment figures show the steelmaking plant reported about 170 spills to land or water over the past decade, although only four “relatively small” releases have been recorded this year, said district manager Geoffrey Knapper.

He was unable to quickly provide details about the size of the spills or the contaminants involved, citing the amount of time needed to search records. But environmental regulations since 2005 have required reporting of any discharge that “may” harm the environment.

Spills could include industrial chemicals, oils or sewage — for example, one reported spill this year involved 136 litres of liquid that contained ammonia. But more commonly reported incidents in recent years include spilled industrial cooling water, which is slightly acidic.

Overall there have been 85 spills to land and 85 to water since 2003, with the worst year coming shortly after Stelco was bought by U.S. Steel. The plant has faced land or water environmental penalties totalling $33,910, mostly related to sewage.

But spills have dropped dramatically since 2008, when 51 were recorded. The changes coincide with plant equipment upgrades, but also new penalties and ministry regulations on spill prevention. Only one spill to land per year has been recorded since 2011.

The Spectator couldn’t reach U.S. Steel Canada spokesperson Trevor Harris Tuesday. But in documents filed seeking court protection for restructuring, the company called itself a “good environmental steward” since it acquired Stelco in 2007, pointing to “significant investments and improvements” in pollution control.

It also says the company is not aware of any “ongoing offsite contaminant discharges,” but acknowledges “a number of spills” over the past century.

“The nature and extent of these legacy environmental impacts are not fully known,” says the court filing.

MORE: U.S. Steel situation adds uncertainty to reef cleanup

The lack of public information about even recent pollution is “frustrating for residents who deserve to be in the know,” said Environment Hamilton head Lynda Lukasik, who argued the ministry should post basic information about spills online.

Lukasik said it’s encouraging to see numbers that suggest improvements over time, but “without context, it’s hard to know what they really mean.”

The worst contamination on the property “is likely attributed to a large extent to historical operations,” said Knapper, noting steelmaking on the site dates back a century. The provincial environment ministry was established in 1972.

A large chunk of the property is actually fill dumped into the harbour — much of it slag, rocky debris left over from smelting. Knapper said examples of expected pollution from long-term steelmaking include chlorinated solvents, heavy metals, oils and polychlorinated biphenyl (PCBs).

Even though the company has indicated it wants to off-load the property, Knapper said the ministry expects U.S. Steel to come up with a “responsible site management plan” that covers “current and historic” pollution.


mvandongen@thespec.com

New interactive map from the Center for Effective Government shows students in proximity to toxic chemicals

1 in 3 U.S. students attend classes near dangerous chemicals

Print

Lubbock Online, Oct. 5, 2014

Roughly one in five school-aged kids attend classes near a Lubbock County facility that stores dangerous chemicals, about twice as many as originally thought, according to a recent study.

The numbers likely could be higher.

Self-reported industry data tucked away in federal reading rooms across the United States show two of the known six facilities storing dangerous chemicals in Lubbock have a vulnerability zone wider than a 1-mile radius, according to a study by the Center for Effective Government, which released a new report last week.

That means there are roughly 9,500 students in 27 schools across the county who attend class near a facility that uses dangerous chemicals.

In May, A-J Media found about 4,200 students were at risk, but that number only reflected students attending class within a mile of a chemical facility. And it did not include detention facilities or private schools.

Researchers were only able to examine a limited number of the nation’s more than 12,000 chemical facilities. The center only examined two of the six facilities in the Hub City — Bayer CropScience and the Lubbock Water Treatment Plant.

Three of the four facilities with dangerous chemicals near Lubbock Independent School District campuses use and store anhydrous ammonia, a volatile chemical that can suffocate, burn the skin and cause blindness. In large quantities, it can be fatal. It is commonly used for refrigeration, among other uses.

Across the U.S., one in three students attends school in a vulnerability zone identified from self-reported industry data, the center reported.

New interactive map from the Center for Effective Government shows students in proximity to toxic chemicals

Lubbock ISD Superintendent Berhl Robertson Jr. did not comment on the new study, but said in May he was not aware of all the chemical facilities near district schools, many of which are 50 years and older.

“Lubbock ISD has a plan for emergencies that impact our schools, both natural disasters and accidents, and we practice those plans,” Nancy Sharp, a district spokeswoman, said in an email to A-J Media.

Chris Wooden, whose wife is expecting their first child next month, called the report “startling and alarming.”

“It’s past the point of needing awareness to where something egregious is going on,” Wooden said.

“With chemical companies not making available the chemicals they are storing without prodding from the government and action groups, it’s scary.”

‘It only takes one bad day’

Roughly 865,000 pounds of toxic chemicals are stored at and used in Lubbock facilities, according to data compiled by the Center for Effective Government, a Washington, D.C., organization that advocates for better health and safety standards.

The city of Lubbock reported that the water treatment plant near the airport on North Guava Avenue has a vulnerability zone of 8 miles, meaning everything within that reported radius could be at risk of a chemical catastrophe.

The Bayer CropScience facility on Erskine Street, which had a spill and evacuation last year in the Guadalupe neighborhood, reported a 2.4-mile vulnerability zone.

There has been growing public concern about public safety in the wake of last year’s deadly fertilizer plant explosion in the small town of West, near Waco and about 340 miles southeast of Lubbock.

“The West Texas fertilizer plant handled their chemicals safely for decades,” said Sean Moulton, director of the Open Government Policy program at the Center for Effective Government.

While the public has pressed for more information about where dangerous chemicals are stored, Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott has clamped down on releasing it.

Abbott, the Republican nominee for governor, has faced withering criticism from his Democratic challenger Wendy Davis and the public after he suggested in July that people drive to facilities and ask what chemicals are being used.

On July 10, after a local facility refused to release any information during a walk in, A-J Media requested information on hazardous chemicals that is required to be filed with the Lubbock Fire Department.

The city has not released any information.

In an Aug. 7 letter to Abbott’s office requesting an opinion, Assistant City Attorney Amy Sims said the information was exempt from disclosure.

Sims, citing Abbott’s earlier opinion, wrote that releasing the location and amounts of dangerous chemicals “may pose a risk to citizens of the city in the case of a terrorist attack.”

Abbott’s office has until Wednesday to respond.

“You have an attorney general down in Texas saying we need to hide this information as though the information was dangerous, not the chemical,” Moulton said.

“People have a right to know if there’s a risk.”

By NICOLE C. BRAMBILA, A-J MEDIA


View the report on kids at risk HERE

group photo st louis

Thugs, Cancer, Radioactive Wastes – EPA Again Sitting on Their Hands

Print

Republic Services sent several of their men – young men—to stand out in front of the hall where a community meeting was being held to hand out corporate propaganda. Imagine walking from your car, after leaving your young child who is suffering from brain cancer at home, to be met by men from the company that you believe is responsible for exposures. “Just clean up the waste, dig it up and take it out of our community,” was the response of one of the local moms.

Republic had a lot of nerve coming to this meeting and leafleting people as they entered the building. Their signs making it look like people were the barrier to EPA cleaning up the site, but its Republic Services that wants to leave the waste where it is, which was the EPA plan before the underground fire. How heartless can you be? Families just learned that there was a significant childhood cancer cluster in the community that surrounds Republic’s radioactive and burning garbage dumps.

One woman told the Republic thugs – what she called them – that she has had both breast removed from cancer and her best friend has lupus. The state health department believes there is a problem, the Attorney General filed a lawsuit because of a problem and the community has a registry that documents health and environmental problems with Republic Services wastes. She was angry, “How dare they send thugs to our meeting of moms, dads and seniors who are sick and tired of Republic’s refusal to do the right thing.”

This community located in St. Louis Missouri area have been fighting to obtain relocation for families living around this site. There are two dumpsites one with garbage that is burning underground and the other is a radioactive waste site. At the meeting one woman spoke up and said, “Do you know what it’s like to tuck your children in at night and then lay in bed waiting for a siren to tell you the fire has reached the radioactive wastes and likely radioactive materials are traveling through the air into your home. It’s terrifying. I can’t move, I can’t stay and I can’t protect my babies.”

Republic Services has enough money to buy the families homes and properly clean up the waste sites. Last year they earned $8.4 billion in revenues and $589 million in profits. If they did the right and responsible thing by moving people and properly cleaning up the wastes they would still have plenty of profits to go around. But instead they send their thugs to picket outside the meeting of Republic Services victims.

Microsoft chairman Bill Gates owns 29 percent of the company’s shares through Cascade Investment, LLC – about $4 billion worth. This includes 16 million shares (worth $645 million) purchased in 2014 alone. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation also owns 1.35 million shares of Republic stock. Gates chief investment officer at Cascade Investment, has been a Republic Services board director since 2009. When Republic pays a $0.28/share quarterly dividend in October 2014, Bill Gates and his Foundation will receive $27.6 million.

CHEJ working with the community are circulating a petition to push Bill Gates to use his power of the vote to move Republic to evacuate families who need to leave and clean up the two sites to remove the hazards. Please help us by signing the petition.